The future frightens me. A rising climate crisis, the global hate of trans people doubling as political bargaining chips, and the eventual embrace of death are always on my mind. As one of the stable hands in 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Tears of the Kingdom loves to tell me, it’s hard to look at the future right now with anything but anxiety. Things are only going to get worse as we move forward, and our collective complacency towards the very worst technological advancements could well be our undoing.Unlike the fading trends of NFTs and the blockchain, the development of AI technology that can easily produce pieces of writing and art is here to stay. Early versions are already being implemented at companies like Ubisoft and Blizzard to help out with the writing of dialogue and production of concept art to help generate project ideas that will one day be taken over by humans. However innocent on the surface this might seem, it should never be excused when the muddy waters of how exactly they exist within the realms of copyright remain to be explored.Excusing these practices is admitting defeat before the battle has even started, and precisely what corporations depend on to both normalise this technology and phase out the introductory grunt work so many of us depend on to get our foot in the door. Fail to replace the found𒁃ations with an alternative boasting equal rigidity and everything will begin to fall apart. We’re at that stage already, and I’d wager the public either doesn’t know, doesn’t care, or welcomes the convenience it will bring to their everyday lives. AI and its associated uses aren’t going away, and we’ve yet to reach a point where its use can be viewed with ethical or legal impartiality. You can’t when its existence is by its very nature built on the efforts of real people. It has no soul and no purpose beyond profit.
Cracks started to show when a TikTok filter was doing the rounds back in 2022. It attempted to turn anything you pointed your phone camera at into an adorable anime character. Given this medium, the majority of📖 results were either cute cats, big-breasted women, or muscular men ready to kick your ass. It didn’t matter whether you focused on a moving car or mobile kitchen utensil, it tended to run into the same awkward problems as the technology kept on training itself again and again with each new submission. We kept feeding it though, willing to forgo privacy and innovation if it meant posting a funny video for our mates to see.
This proliferation hasn’t slowed down since, with entire art and 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:literat🧜𒅌ure competitions having to close up shop due to an onslaught of obvious AI 💞entries. Creators both professional and enthusiast are now concerned their livelihoods will be stripღped away by daring to put their work out there for others to see. to prevent their performances being reused in cases far beyond their control, all because corporations know they can hold us hostage to cut monetary corners.
Earlier this week also saw Nvidia introduce a new technology at Computex known as which can be used to create appearances, dialogue, and roles for NPCs in games, and it requires nothing more than writing a profile that informs how individuals should operate in the fictional world. You can ask the character questions and it will produce responses that aren’t written or curated, but produced through artificialꦗ intelligence using the information already available. Our example here concerns a ramen shop owner who talks and looks much like a robot, predictably droll in his mannerisms because beneath the hood, that’s exactly what he is. It’s primitive here, likely on purpose, since Nvidia is trying to provide consumers with a tertꦆiary glimpse that still puts human devs in control. But for how long?
Corporations, and in our case major game developers and publishers, will be the first to take advantage of AI that simplifies the production of vocal performances, program scripting, and art because it saves them spending money to hire professionals who are trained to do such things. This ability to use aඣrtificial intelligence to create anything we want is wrongly billed as the breaking down of boundaries, and how anyone will soon be able to make fictional worlds of their own without limitation.
It won’t unfold like this though, especially when the majority of influence already ꧒sits with a few select companies and individuals who have all the power to steer exactly where these developments are going. It isn’t a liberating act for this medium, I see it as a forcible stranglehold that will take away jobs, limit creativity, and further the bleak homogeneity we’ve already se🦂en infect much of what we love. We should all be concerned about where things are going, since failing to act now will see everything change, and it’ll be too late to speak up. I may sound hyperbolic, but if AI continues as is it has the potential to be apocalyptic for creative industries.
Things are moving too fast for us to comprehend them right now, and the years to come will likely be a battleground for legislating precisely how AI can be used ethically in the media we love 𓆉without putting humans out of work or reducing every piece of media down to hollow regurgitations of things we’ve seen cou🍌ntless times before. We need to learn how to live with the rapid advance of AI, but allowing it to unfold without protest will only doom us.
