It's finally official—no one knows what a video game is. In the recent 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Apple V Epic court case, the judge just made a ruling that 168澳洲幸运5开ꦆ奖网:Apple🔥 must allow third-party payment options, bringing the long battle between the companies to a close. But within the bulky 185 pages of the for this case, we can see that part of the discussion involved a debate on what actually constitu𒁃tes a video game, and the conclusion was anything but informative.
In a section titled, “Defining a Video Game,” the court first𒅌 attempted to come up with a definition. But according to the official documents, “no one agrees, and neither side introduc𒈔ed evidence of any commonly accepted industry definition.”
Despite this conundrum, it seems that everyone was eventually able to conclude a “bare minimum” description for what a video game is. The groundbreaking definition outlined that “video games appear to require some level of interactivity or involvement between the player and the medium… This gaming definition contrasts to other forms of en▨tertainment, which are often passive forms enjoyed by consumers.”
Luckily, this debate on video games in the Apple V Epic court case has finally led to a conclusion on the age-old debate as to whether Fortnite is actually a video game. It was decided that the Court “need not reach a conclusive definition of a video game,” because Fortnite is “both internally and externally considered a video game.” So, in a shocking turn of events, we now know that Fortnite is indeed a vid🐻eo game, according to the United States District Court, despite the fact that the Court simultaneously does not know what a video game is.
The Court concluded this topic by stating 😼that it “need not further define the outer boundaries of the definition of video games for purposes of this dispute.” Sadly for us, this means 🤪that we will all have to remain in the dark until a future court case will hopefully help us identify what video games are in the future.