The FPS genre is usually dominated by two titles: 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Call of Duty and 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Battlefield. Both games have their own target audience and style, but their genre and 💦gameplay structure make comparisons inevitable between the two. After all, both franchises' games are made to rake as many players in and keep𓄧 them for prolonged periods of multiplayer fragging (and trash-talking).
For some, knowing where to devote their time and skills is important. That's why we're here with the age-old ꩲquestion: Call of Duty or Battlefield? Mustard or ketchup? Anyway, it's high time again to pit the two game franchises ag💞ainst each other. They keep churning out these new titles from time to time so here's some help in picking where to perform some 360-no-scopes.
Updated June 13, 2021 by Sid Natividad: With the new Battlefield 6 looming about on the horizon, we can't help but revisit and discuss some expectations regarding the franchise. Call of Duty isn't backing down from the fight either as it's also handing out its own dose of exciting changes, particularly for Call of Duty: Warzone. Hence, the ongoing war between the two multiplayer-focused FPS franchises rages on.
Battlefield vs Call of Duty is bound to be a more intense conundrum as the latter keeps the pressure. As always, we're just here to help you decide to pick a side by adding more merits to either video game franchises. Since they just keep upping the ante, we can't help but find more to like in either. So again, which is better? Battlefield or Call of Duty? Let us count the ways again.
14 Why Ca🍃ll Of Duty: Better Anti-Cheat Software
Fire up an old Battlefield game (such as Battlefield 1 or even Hardline) and it probably won't take you long to see a shotgun user sniping you from several conquest points away or a floating machine gun. The cheating sit💟uation is ramp✅ant in Battlefield games.
While something like that is also present in Call of Duty titles, it's not as bad because the developers seem more vigilant on banning users. Their anti-ch🌄eat countermeasures also seem more effective. Battlefield🗹 6 will need to cover this weakness and prioritize it.
13 Why Battlefield🐟: Intense Innovation
Battlefield games have always tried to outdo their previous games and as a result, each new tech or mechanic to the game tends to revolutionize the franchise as a whole. The latest in this trend is the more destructible environments in Battlefield 6 along with weather effects that aren't jus๊t for show.
It would appear that Battlefield 6 will feature the most fully realized vision of the developers for what they intend in a Battlefield game. It simply makes Call of Duty's environments feel flat or uninspired.
12 Why Call Of Duty: More Acces🐼sible 🌸
With that said, Call of Duty has its own charm for the general population. There's a reason why a big chunk of its players are kids; it's highly accessible and simple. Whereas Battlefield games require communication, team reliance, and coordination for victories, Call of Duty games are more of an arcade experience.
Each player can become a one-man army if they want and the bullet and gun physics are more streamlined. Battlefield ga𝓰mes try to mix in some realism with their arcad𒁃e aspects and it ends up having a higher learning curve.
11 Why Battlefield: More Imme✨rsive Sound Design
Battlefield 1 is the prime example of this franchise strength. Each artillery echo, bellows of pain, and orchestral score during pivotal moments of an Operation or a Conques♏t is worth more than any single-player campaign from Call of Duty or Battlꦫefield.
It all adds up to make Battlefield a more immersi๊ve experience even in a multiplayer aspect. Gun sounds are also more impactful and just the general rattling of weapon🐟s-fire in the faraway distance makes the experience more palpable.
10 Why Call Of Duty: Faster-Paꦫced
There's a reason why Mountain Dew and Doritos are almost synonymous with Call of Duty. The game is so fast-paced you'd need as much sugar as you can to cope with the adrenaline rush and Doritos are just ther🍌e because they're accessible snacks.
Seriously though, Call of Duty's multiplayer is better suited for people looking for quick matches that provide instant gratification. Your team lost? Jump into another match and keep doing that until you win. The recoil-less guns and superhuman player av🐻atars make that possible.
9 Wh👍y Battlefield: Realistic Combat ✱
Then again, players might be looking for something more grounded in reality as much as possible. In that field, Battlefield wins due to its adherence to real-world physics which isn't saying much 💦because Battlefield games are actually terrible simulat🦋ors. Still, they're more realistic compared to Call of Duty.
This is easily seen in the head bobbing animations of the characters and even the recoil of the guns. Sniping and long-range firefights for that matter, are more satisfying in Battlefield games because of all the calculations involved.
8 🐼 Why Call Of Duty: Better Storytelling
Call of Duty stories aren't exactly that "good," sometimes they're even worse than B military movies made only with the intent of army recruitment. But compared to what Battlefield has on offer, Call of Duty might as well be the Citizen Kane of military-themed FPS.
Call of Duty's characters are a lot more memorable and they actually have personalities. The Black Ops titles are some of the most riveting ones in the series when it comes to story. Battlefield just can't capture that same level of narrative presentation.
7 Why Battlefield: Better Graphics 🌌
Speaking of presentation, this is a tough one as Call of Duty games look like they're catching up but the latest Battlefield titles remain as some of the most graphically impressive FPS games out the𓃲re. Even Battlefield 1 is difficult to top these days.
The general atmosphere of that game as well as its faithfulness to the setting is quite unparalleled. Some fans even call Battlefield 1 a PTSD simulator given how realistic it is, especially with the HUD off.
6 Why Call Of Duty: More 🦋Rewarding Multiplayer
Since Call of Duty's multiplayer is more suited to people looking to frag others and then move one, then it's more emotionally fulfilling. It allows for more wins and more exciting encounters whereas Battlefield games and their large maps compress the combat mostly to the frontlines.
Additionally, the progression tiers or leveling system in Call of Duty games gives more frequent and substantial rewards compared to Battlefield games. If you're impatient or want to win as much as possible, then C𒉰all of Duty games are arguably better suited.
5 ᩚᩚᩚᩚᩚᩚᩚᩚᩚ𒀱ᩚᩚᩚ Why Battlefield: Larger Scale 🤡
Then again, nothing quite compares to the spectacle that the large playgrounds of Battlefield give to the players. Seeing an airship crash in a multiplayer match or f🌃ighter planes duke it out in the skies while infantrymen suffer in the hell below is just a unique experience.
Even Call of Duty's single-player scripted events don't come close to that. The bigger maps ensure that battles play out like they do in actual warfare as much as possible with an emphasis on taking points and tactical assaults.