A new 7GB texture pack for Call of Duty Warzone and Black Ops Cold War ღhas been released by Activision for 𓆉PS5, Xbox Series X|S, and PC. The pack is recommended for displays of 1440p and above, so base last-gen consoles will not be able to leverage it.
As pointed out by , thi♌s is the🎃 fifth texture pack that has been released for Warzone, with previous ones targeted towards ꦑweapons and character models. Needless to say that this pack will increase t🅘he game’s already huge file size.
Whilℱe Warzone texture packs have been coming in pretty regularly, so have t꧋he game’s ridiculous number of bugs. Some of them have been funny, like the murder door found in Karst Salt Mine which would kill an💃yone that even touched it. Others have unfortunately been game breaking, like bounty contract targets appearing in the Gulag, making it impossible to complete.
One of the biggest recent bugs however was something that broke the game’s competitive format. Players c🐻ould glitch behind walls and sometimes even below the map, into otherwise inaccessible areas. From there they could not only stay hidden from enemies, but also shoot them without being seen. They were essentially inside an impenetrable force shield which also made them invisible. Activision has been workin🔴g on these issues however, and the reported cases have dropped.
Yesterday we reported abܫout prominent Call of Duty and Battlefield leaker♑, , saying that Call of Duty Vanguard will alle✱gedly be like "Black Ops Cold War 2.0". They say that it will release in 2021 an⛦d that Warzone will receive a WW2 map as a crossover. This map will be larger than Verdansk, and make room for additional vehicles and๊ travel options rather than more players.
Speaking of looking like something else, a jury has ruled against pro wrestler Booker T., who filed a ꦬsuit against Activision in 2019, claiming that the character of David "Prophet" Wilkes was a copy of his GI Bro persona. The wrestler’s lawyer used a poster to make side-by-side comparisons between the hairstyle, outfit, facial expression, and even the persona’s attitude. However, the jury found that the similarities were not enougꦛh to count as copyright infringement.