168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Microsoft has 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:won its court battle with the FTC regarding the 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Activision Blizzard deal, and it’ll take something monumental to stop the acquisition from passing now if events roll out the way Xbox is hoping for. The extensive hearing which saw Sony’s big names doing everything in their power to stop the deal from moving forward was decided upon unanimously after the judge saw nothing in the opposing arguments to believe Microsoft sweeping up the company would result in unfair competition in the market. They’re wrಌong, but my opinion doesn’t matter.
While the features an extensive list of reasoning and conclusions, 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Call of Duty once again remains one of the prevailing arguments. During the trial, discussions about the blockbuster shooter and﷽ ho🐬w
Microsoft would have an incentive to make it exclusive to Xbox and PC were brought up consistently, and how it would be removed from opposing platforms and thus create an unfair vacuum of competition in the market. The judge, it seems, pushed right through this logic. When you see her reasoning, it becꦅomes pretty hard to disagree.
“Before the merger, a consumer wanting to play a Call of Duty console game had to buy a PlayStation or an Xbox,” Judge Corley concluded. “After the merger, consumers can uti♋lize the clouꦆd to play on the device of choice, including, it is intended, on the Nintendo Switch. Perhaps bad for Sony. But good for Call of Duty gamers and future gamers.”
Sony’s ace in the hole was💧 stopped in its tracks because it, ironically, failed to consider how the video game market has changed, and how much of its competition has moved on from the reliable cadence of prestige exclusives to live service ecosystems and experiences no longer confined by traditional platforms. Call of Duty is still an annual franchise known for🐻 selling millions of copies around the world, but it’s also evolved, and will continue to do so.
Another year brings with it another Call of Duty, and Activision Blizzard has come to rely on the series for consistent returns at launch followed by a constant stream of content through Warzone, seasonal battle passes, and regular content updates that ensure thos💮e who enjoy the game will keep on playing right up until the next entry rolls around. The second it begins to grow old, the next entry is announced and the cycle begins anew. Sony is afraid the merger will result in it missing out on substantial profits and a franchise that undoubtedly keeps a lot of people in the PlayStation fold, but right now it seems those fears aren’t justified enough to stop one of the biggest acquisitions💯 in gaming history. Unfortunately, Judge Corley is right.
Call of Duty has changed so much since the days of PS3 and Xbox 360. Back in the day, one of the few things we had to worry about in regard to exclusivity was which platform had the rights to map packs before the other, a marketing gimmick that Sony and Microsoft held over each other for years. Aside from the occasional slice of exclusive digital content, those days are over as Call of Duty shifts into a live service൩ identity which requires platform ubiquity for the benefit of everyone. Without it, much of it would cease to operate. As a consequence, it seems the claims Sony is making to hold back the Activision Blizzard deal don’t hold water, and never will as the picture continues to change in the face of new platforms, services, and technology that make needing consoles to enjoy your games a thing of the past.
When games like Destiny, Fortnite, Genshin Impact, Warframe, and countless others exist across all platforms with a willingness to shift and cha♊nge with the times - and often rivalling the number of players engaging with Call of Duty - you can’t make an argument regarding its exclusivity anymore without looking like a fuddy duddy. It isn’t the only game on the block these days like when I was in school and conversations were dominated by Modern Warfare and quick-scoping your closest friends in Rust deathmatches. The medium has changed, as has the exclusive landscape in which this monumental deal is being decided. No one game is enough to swing the momentum in favour of either console giant, and this strategy will be less and less effective as time goes on, and the medium becomes more accessible.
Of course, Microsoft is merely telling the court everything it wants to hear in order to push this deal through, and I wouldn’t be surprised if its tune changed when Activision Blizzard is in its good graces and the act of making money becomes its priority. This monopoly surfaces a lot of worrying discussions and potential outcomes, but all ൲of them are so much bigger than Call of Duty, and claiming it to be the defining factor in this conversation is outdate🦄d and fails to consider exactly how much of an impact this deal will have once the ink is finally dried.
