Of all the alignments in , Lawful Neutral gets stereotyped as inflexible and impossible to deal with. Even 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Lawful Good characters, who are known for harassing the party’s less morally-inclined bards and rogues, can be counted to do the right thing at the end of the day, but Lawful Neutral characters are too often played as lawbringers with no regard for moral complexiꦐty. It does not have to be this way; there are plenty of ways to play Lawful Neutral that won’t have you fighting against your party.
The most important guideline for playing Lawful Neutral is this: remember that you don’t have to be Judge Dredd. All the Lawful Neutral alignment means is that you hold a legal or personal code over any larger sense of morality. There’s nothing inherꦑent to the alignment about how you need to respond to others who break your rules, or even how strongly you need to feel about them.
This ꦇmeans that you don’t need to take it upon yourself to deputize 🍃yourself and execute lawbreakers in the streets. In fact, your party will probably appreciate it if you don’t do that. Essentially, refrain yourself from harsh justice when it would derail a campaign, get your party thrown in jail, or otherwise kill the mood.
Aside from exercising a l𓂃ittle restraint, one of the most important roleplaying decisions to make is to decide why you believe what you do. Do you think that order is more important to society than individual morality? Were you brainwashed by a totalitarian society to believe that obeying the law is the same thing as morality? Are you motivated out of self-interest because you specifically benefit from a Lawful society? Any of these choices could conceivably fall under the Lawful Neutral alignment, but would be roleplayed completely differently.
Also, your character being Lawful Neutral does not mean that they can never experience moral complexity. Lawful Neutral characters may encounter things that challenge their worldview. They may decide that their alignment is wrong and change their perspective, or they may double down, believing that other worldviews are tempting them from the correct path. Characters are allowed to have internal struggle, even ongoing internal struggle. You are not obligated to play a Lawful robo🦩t.
Your Lawful nature doesn’t even have to engage with the actual law. Lawful can refer to following a strict code just as well as𝓀 actual laws. However, when playing a character with a code, the line between Lawful Neutral and Lawful Good can become blurred. A good rule of thumb is that a Lawful Good character might have a code because it is a bullet-pointed version of their personal morality, while a Lawful Neutral character might value the code itself. For instance, a Lawful Good character could have a hard rule against killing because they believe killing is wrong, while a Lawful Neutral character may have a rule against killing specifically because it is against their code of conduct.
Paladins, of course, have codes like these built into their subclass by their own nature, but other religious classes could have similar codes. A Path of the Zealot barbarian could have a ♒stringent code to follow the tenets of Kord, for instance. Additionally, groups such as monasteries, temples, or warrior orders may have codes or traditions that its members follow.
Playing Lawful Neutral in D&D does not mean that you have to play a rigid bootlicker. There are many ways to play a Lawful Neutral character with complex emotions and a nuanced worl♒dview, juꦅst like any other alignment.