168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Dying Light 2 is painfully dull. It’s an example of post-apocalyptic fiction that outranks even 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:The Walking Dead with how grey, lifeless, and poorly written its world manages to be. I shouldn’t be surprised given the first game’s lacklustre narrative and the mediocrity of Dead Island, but part of me hoped that the ambition being flaunted ac🌊ross its myriad trailers and previews meant that this follow-up was going to be something more. Guess I was wrong.
The game relies on a milquetoast protagonist and poor world building to pull us into an experience that is filled with needless busywork and unlikeable characters. Dying Light 2 clearly had a troubled development history, a scar shown by its multiple delays and changes throughout the years that turned a once profound morality system into a binary selection of upgrade trees that make your choices feel like they don’t matter at all. It could have pushed the zombie genre forward forever, but instead stagnates li𒆙ke the shambling corpses that roam its vast yet forgettable streets.
One of the most damning criticisms I have is how irrelevant the undead feel in the game’s world. The original game made zombies feel like a genuine thre💙at, the early hours forcing our protagonist to avoid them entirely or risk a swift death, while venturing out at night often resulted in chases fuelled by sudden bursts of adrenaline as blood-curdling screams chased you across shanty town rooftops. So much of that anxiety is absent in the sequel, with zombies feeling like a nuisance to be accommodated instead of a fundame🐭ntal part of this world. This is the apocalypse that brought humanity to its knees, but they don’t seem to care.
Obviously Villedor’s population would learn to live with the undead, surviving infection and taking shelter at night becoming the norm ꦓinstead of an eventuality to be feared. But if that’s the case, it makes no sense to me that the human race hasn’t banded together to help bring about a new world, putting aside factions that only exist to further the narrative while seeking to reform some semblance of society. I asked myself this question time and time ag𓄧ain throughout Dying Light 2, especially when I stumbled upon citizens wandering the streets within spitting distance of hordes that were seconds away from chomping them down. The game does an awful job of cementing the stakes of the world it wants you to spend several dozen hours in, and that’s a big problem. Aiden’s role as a Pilgrim, the Peacekeepers, the Renegades, and countless other groups are generic contrivances built around a plot with no logical reason for their own existence. The terrible dialogue doesn’t help either.
So why not get rid of the zombies altogether? Remove the reason behind this apocalypse that continually fails to justify its own presence. We’ve seen this time and time again in contemporary fiction whether it be games, films, TV shows or books. The plot needs to continue, so the zombies just hang around, so we can get on with it. None of us know how humanity will respond when an extinction event of this magnitude emerges, and many believe we’d form factions and resort to murder far soon♐er than we’d be willing to show compassion and work together. Maybe these stories are right and Dying Light 2 is on the money, but it’s also a tiresomely cliched view of the apocalypse that brings nothing new to the table.
Yet the parkour mechanics that remain Dying Light 2’s strongest asset are still so ripe for exploration. Why not envision a game where the undead are finally dying out, succumbing to their own starvation as only a handful of fresh cases roam the streets. This would give our characters a reason to remain fearful, while also opening up an entirely new narrative thread as existing factions realise that the streets below will soon be ripe for the taking, opening up an aspect of the world that was once ruled by the infected. We could side with a group who wishes to share this resurgent society with everyone, or give into fascism and seek to divide a꧙nd conquer however possible. Resources will remain a problem, but instead of chasing after a terrible main villain we would be reacting to realistic struggles and the conflicts that naturally arise from such ultimatums. Pull a 28 Days Later and explore how the undead would decay overtime, making it clear they still operate by the whims of human biology.
One of the more evil factions could even wish to start another outbreak, maintaining the status quo because they fear losing power if the human race even dares return to normality. It’s a tangible 𓆉yet simple threat for us to deal with, and one where moral decisions can be woven into the narrative without feeling forced or unnecessary. The majority of combat in Dying Light 2 takes place against humans anyway, with zombies only occasionally bumping into you when exploring buildings or screwing up a jump and yeeting into the streets. No matter how I slice it, the undead feel like a barrier to my enjoyment, so I can’t help but think of alternate scenarios where their place in the story actually means somet🧸hing. Make people the focus anyway, which the sequel does anyway, but make them better written as they fight for a purpose that encapsulates this world in its entirety instead of having our boring ass white boy searching for his zombie sister. She might be alive, I haven’t gotten that far.
When my chief complainꦺt about Dying Light 2 is about the presence of zombies it speaks to how misguided and bloated the game truly is. It tries to do so much and falls short in the majority of its ambitions, so it would benefit in being more focused on the story it hopes to tell and the threats it hopes to e🌞mphasise in a setting that doesn’t do nearly enough to stand out in a genre that has long become saturated. I’d be terrified if a zombie apocalypse were to take place in reality, but in Dying Light 2 I’m just bored.
