Modern warfare has never been portrayed as excitingly and with a scale as ambitious or visceral as in 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Battlefield games. To this day, it truly is one-of-a-kind when it comes to 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:first-person shooter subgenres. There have been many like it but none offer the same graphical fidelity or production value that Battlefield games bring to the table.
As a result, Battlefield games – even the worst among them – are still quite good. At least, that's what the critics say. There have been more than 10 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Battlefield games since its inception nearly 18 years ago and it still sticks to what it does best, which is to bring a large-scale battlefield to gaming hardware. Here's how the best and the worst Battlefield games fared.
10 🐷BEST: BATTLEFIELD: BAD COMPANY 2 - 88 🌼
Battlefield: Bad Company 2 is a sequel that arguably managed to surpass its predecessor in both quality and presentation. It has a more robust story and the graphics, as well as the environmental carnage, 🅠has been im🤡proved.
It also paved the way for more successful future titles such as Battlefield 3. 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Bad Company's unique mechanics brought a lot to the table and made future Battlefield games more interesting and frantic.
9 ও WORST: BATTLEFIELD V - 81 🐽
168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Battlefield V is not exactly a bad game but at least it's not the worst in the family tree. It has by far the best graphics of any Battlefield game to date but where it suffered from was presentation and gameplay🧔.
Granted, 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Battlefield V had big shoes to fill as it came after the successful and gritty Battlefield 1. Sadly, a lot of players and even critics, for that matter, thought Battlefield V didn't live up to the previous title, even as a tried and🐬 tested WWII shooter.
8 BEST: BATTLEFIELD 1 - 89 ꧒
Speaking of Battlefield 1, it's by far the most atmospheric title among all its cousins and brothers. The best selling point here is the fresh setting, WWI. It's an era in modern history tha♎t's less explored or documented.
However, that doesn't make it any less bloody and violent. In fact, Battlefield 1, showed gamers all over the world just how much more of a meat grinder WWI battles are compared to WWII or contemporary warfare. As a result, plenty of players still prefer this one over the latest, Battlefield V.
7 🐽 WORST: BATTLEFIELD 2142 - ♌80
One can consider Battlefield 2142 as the black sheep in the family. It was a bold move by 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:developer DICE and publisher EA to delve into futuristic warfare but how they executedꦺ thatꩵ vision was somewhat lacking in inspiration.
Battlefield 2142 explores a post-apocalyptic future where a 2nd Ice Age is ongoing and people started fighting because... resources... probably. In any case, it featured armored walkers, sci-fi guns, and even dropships. They're all just fancy reimaginations or repaintings of old Battlefield tropes, however.
6 BEST: BATTLEFജIELD 3 - 89
If the first two Bad Company games were the spark, then Battlefield 3 was the big firꦰe that came afterward. It was an improvement in every way to the formula and introduced some of the most cutting-edge visuals back in its heyday.
It was EA and DICE's best answer to the growing and raging popularity of 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Call of Duty's 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Modern Warfare titles. Battlefield 3 even has a singleplayer mode that shows off its bells and whistles well 🔯enough. As usual, don't expect to fight anyt🅷hing other than Russians or Middle-Eastern opponents in the story campaign as cliche at it may sound.
5 ♔ WORST: BATTLEFIELD HARDLINE - 73
Battlefield 2142 is the black sheep, then Battlefield Hardline is that one 🔜cousin who keeps hanging out with it. It's yet again another experiment by the developers and this time, it involves urban warfare between police and criminals.
The singleplayer campaign is good enough and has a decent story. Where it becomes weird is with the multiplayer, which introduced new modes; they capture the feel of Fast and Furious franchise's car chase sequences or gunfights. It probably would have had better reception without the "Battlefield" in the title.
4 ♕ 💟 BEST: BATTLEFIELD 1942 - 89
Confusing titles and number sequences aside, here's the very first Battlefield game, Battlefield 1942. It was released back in 2002 and as the title says, takes WWII to the next level by introducing full-scale combat including♕ planes ♏and vehicles.
Battlefield 1942 back then was a marvel. It was FPS wargaming at its finest in an industry where the only WWII games are linear and scripted. The core formula remains the same as it was in 1942 with 64-player all-out war matches.
3 WORST: BATTLEF🐎IELD HEROES - 69 ♍
One of the worst titles in the franchise, Battlefield Heroes was EA and DICE's attempt to bring Battlefield to a wid⭕er and more casual audience. They did so by making the game cartoonish and frꦕee to play.
Battlefield Heroes introduced MMO-style progression and gameplay and graphics akin to free-to-play heavy hitters like Team Fortress 2. Sadly, it was not well-received as its only market was new casual players and didn't attract old Battlefield fans.
2 💝 BEST: BATTLEFIELD 2 - 91 ও
Establish FPS titles that primarily made WWII shooters moving into modern warfare territory tend to be celebrated. Turns out Battlefield 2 did that earlier than the Call of Duty franchise. It was a 2005 game that broke ground, introducing the signature Battlefield gameplay but with a contemporary sheen.
This is also the first Battlefield game to put emphasis on teamwork and squad management. It has no singleplayer campaign but it's one of the few Battlefield gꦑames that allow bots i♔n teams. Whatever happened to that standard feature?
1 🌳 WORST: BATTLEFIELD: PLAY4FREE - 68
Since Battlefield Heroes was, for lack of a better word, a flop, EA tried again with Battlefield: Play4Free. Unfortunately, it did even worse. It's not hard to find "pay-to-win"⛎ sentimenꦰts and aggressive income scheme woes from players.
Apparently, there was also a rampant cheating problem and the game's "free" tag wears off a few hours into progression. Not only was the game's name aesthetically displeasing but its inherent income structure made it the worst Battlefield game to date.