168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Microsoft isn’t having a good week. More documents have been leaked as part of the FTC v. Activision court case that reveal 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:upcoming strategies, 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:game releases, hardware, and stuff the corporation likely isn’t happy to have in the public eye just yet. This is the consequence of such a high profile acquisition however, with Xbox forced to lay bare its intentions in order to get this deal over the line. We’🃏re eating up all the gossip, so at least someone is winning.
Within this bukkake of gamer goodness also came a revelation that we should all have seen coming, but a number of gamers aren’t happy with. 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Elder Scrolls 6, the next major game by Bethesda Game Studios which likely won’t break cover until 2026 at the earliest, will not be coming to PlayStation 5 or othe♎r riva👍l platforms.
We had a similar outcry about 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Starfield as it was announced as an Xbox and PC exclusive, despite word that a PS5 version had indeed been in the works prior to Microsoft’s acquisition of Bethesda. It’s a bummer that fewer people are now able to play one of the biggest games of the year, but it’s a logical decision to make if you spent billions on a game company you need to prove the value of. Doing the opposite w🧸ould make consumers happy, but anger just about everyone else. As a company looking out for its bottom line, Microsoft made a decision.
Playing nicely with your competitors undermines that, especially when a big reason for the acquisition was to avoid a possible future where Starfield ended up becoming ꦏa PlayStation exclusive instead. I would prefer to play Starfield on PS5, but for the time being that isn’t an option because this industry has become a mess of greedy monopolies and acquisitions that are yet to bear fruit in a lot of cases. Bethesda needed to prove its worth, and will need to do so again and again if Microsoft hopes to justify sprawling RPGs that take several years and millions of dollars to make. There’s extra pennies to be made with a cross-platform release, but right now I don’t see a world where that comes to pass unless out of sheer desperation.
What’s funny is that in the past, Xbox has denied ever discussing the act of culling versions of its titles in development for other platforms. This happened with Redfall, in which it denied that a PS5 skew was cancelled following the Bethesda acquisition. Turns out that totally did happen, since there’s a spreadsheet in these court documents that details this exact tactic being discussed. It’s how we found out about Elder Scrolls 6, proving that corporations are going to spin little white lies i💜f it makes them look good and keeps shareholders happy. But I’m not surprised by it anymore. I fail to see the value in becoming angry at blockbuster𓆏s like Elder Scrolls 6 or Starfield which are now bankrolled by Bethesda coming over to any rival platform. We should be unhappy about it, although our protests won’t change a thing.
It’s ironic that in a console landscape that is increasingly less reliant on classic exclusives that the ownership of games by companies is more precarious than ever. Acquisitions are made to help consoles get ahead in a race that is slowly teetering towards several different platforms and services, consolidating an entertainment medium which is eager to spread its wings and be more apprဣoachable than ever. Which is it? Wheth🐼er it realises it or not, the folks over at Microsoft are undermining this progress. It sucks to see worthwhile pieces of art treated as bargaining chips even if the intelligent side of me knows it makes sense. But that doesn’t mean I have to be happy about it. Either way though, we all have to deal with it.
