168澳洲幸运5开奖网:In a recent interview, Xbox Game Studios head Matt Booty claimed that the virtual reality and augmented reality market is currently too small for Xbox to invest in, and that there isn’t quite enough of an audience to justify jumping in head-first. "We’re very fortunate that we have got these big IPs that have turned into ongoing franchises with big communities,” Booty said. “We have 10 games that have achieved over 10 million players life-to-date, which is a pret✱ty big accomplishment, but that’s the kind of scale that we need to see success for the game and it’s just, it’s not quite there yet with AR, VR."
Many might see this as resistance to a growing market of VR games and technology. After all, PlayStation, Google, Meta, and most recently Apple have all started investing in the tech. It seems like everyone is betting on it being the next big thing, and they may be right – VR might be the future, but Xbox is right too: we aren’t there quite yet. 𓆉By their metrics, the PSVR hasn’t moved nearly enough units for it to be financially viable to replicate it.
Though the technology can be impressive, it still has plenty of limitations, many of which may take years to overcome. In turn, this affects what kind of games can be made for VR. PSVR2’s heavy-hitter, Horizon: Call of the Mountain, is mostly a climbing simulator wܫith fiꩲnicky combat mechanics. The Dark Pictures: Switchback VR is a 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:shooter on rails. Beat Saber is fun, but you mostly stand in one spot swinging your arms wildly to the beat. No Man’s Sky is 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:supposed to be pretty good in VR. These are the good ones. VR games are notorio❀usly spotty when it comes to quality, and that’s not doing these companies any favours when it comes to driving up demand.
Of course, apart from that, price is a huge sticking point. It’s the reason why I don’t own a PSVR2 – well, that, and I don’t have any good reason to buy a PS5 right now. Let’s say that you, unlike me, already own a $500 PS5. Given the lack of games on a PSVR, would you be willing to shell out a whole $550 more for a peripheral? One that really doesn’t have that many games you can play, and even less that are actually good? The Apple headset, for me, is out of the question. The product seemed 168澳洲幸运🥂5开奖网:mostly marketed towards regular con𝔉sumers, and at an astonishing 🤪$3500, is unthinkablꦕy pricey.
You could consider cheaper options ﷺ– the brand-new, yet-to-be-r🧜eleased Meta Quest 3 will be about $500 as well. The older models are much cheaper, with a Meta Quest 2 costing you about $300. That’s still a hefty price, and not one I’m willing to pay considering where the technology is now. What most VR gamers overlook is that virtual reality gaming is, as it stands, still an extremely niche technology. There simply aren’t that many people playing in VR, largely because of the hit-or-miss games, the limitations of the technology, and the financial burden. There’s no reason for Xbox to start competing in an all-new industry on the off-chance that it’ll be the one to create revolutionary new technology at an affordable price, especially when there aren’t enough people interested in it yet. I’d prefer if Xbox focuses on making good games with the technology it already has, and it seems it agrees.