Nintendo has issued a response following the 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:recent allegations of union-busting, saying that it will cooperate with the investigation into the matter. However, ꦛit has also stated that it is "not aware of any attempts to unionize". It claims that the employee in question was not terminated for their organization efforts, maintaining that the company provides☂ a "welcoming and supportive" working environment.
This comes as even more employees speak o🍎ut about their time at Ninten꧟do, painting a very different picture of what it is like working for the industry giant. Many other workers say they were also punished for raising concerns in meetings, supporting the contrac🃏tor who says they were let ꦆgo for their unionization efforts.
"We are aware of the claim, which was filed with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) by a contractor who was previously terminated for the disclosure of confidential information and for no other reason", a representative of Nintendo explains in a . "Nintendo is not aware of any attemp🐬ts to unionize or related activity and intends to cooperate with the investigation💎 conducted by the NLRB.
"Nintendo is fully committed to providing a 𒉰welcoming and supportive work environment for all our employees and contractors. We take🍨 matters of employment very seriously."
The complaint that triggered the investigation into Nintendo was issued by an anonymous employee. They claim that surveillance, threats, retaliation, and layoffs were used to dissuade workers from speaking out about the conditions at Nintendo. Earlier today, other workers at Nintendo backed this claim up, saying they were reprimanded for speaking out about working conditions during Covid, as well as the company's support for Asian employees following the rise in racist attacks in 2020.
Nintendo counterclaims that the anonymous worker was instead terminated for breaching their non-disclosure agreement. In today's report, coworkers say that while a social media post from the employee could have potentially been in breach of the NDA, it was not severe enough to warrant dismissal from the company.