Making remakes of older games has become a huge trend recently, with this year seeing more remakes coming out than ever before. We've already seen the remakes of 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Resident Evil 3, 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Persona 5, and 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Final Fantasy VII. Still to come are Crysis Remastered, Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 1 + 2, and System Shock. Even SpongeBob SquarePants: Battle for Bikini Bottom is getting remade.
The reason for all the remakes is simဣple: there's high demand from nostalgic fans, so releasing updated versions is an easy cash grab. Publishers can make money from the same game a second time, while often making minimal changes. It seems like, for the most part, they'll just update the graphics, add a few more scenes, and release it as a "new game" that's r♛eady to go.
For example, Persona 5 came out fairly recently in 2017, and just three years later, it's already been remade. Though the remake is arguably better than the original, only minimal changes have been made. 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Final Fantasy VII Remake, on the other hand, is a bit of a different case. Based⛦ on the original that released back in 1997, and it's received a significant overhaul, with new scenes adding more depth.
One of the advantages publishers have is that gamers tend to be very nostalgic when it comes to the ꦕold favorite games. These games mig🎃ht have blown their minds at the time, and now they want to re-live the experience.
However, some games, like the 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Counter-Strike series, never get old. Players are happy to play the same game over and over again for years on end with only minor graphics and gameplay changes. Despite CS:GO's immense popularity, the CS 1.6's servers are still busy and managed to hit in April, which isn't badౠ for a game that's more than 20 years old.
So, how do publishers decide which games deserve remakes? Obviously, they likely decide based on a game's popularity -- and how much money the original made. It wouldn't be a great move to remake a game that flopped the first time around. The problem with this mindset, however, is that financial success isn't always an indicator of whether a game is good or bad, and thus whether it deserves a remake. There are many great games that flopped financially but went on to become cult classics. For example, Vampire: The Masquerade - Bloodlines didn't do well when it first came out, but has become popular enough to 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:receive a sequel.
Though🦹 many gamers want to experience updated versions of their favorite games, it seems like more and more publishers are pushing out remakes as blatant cash-grabs, without adding much to the original game. There are many old games that were great when they first came out and haven't stood the test of time that could potentially be remade, but it's important 🌳to remember that remakes don't always make for a better experience. Some games need to be left alone and remembered for what they were.
Duke Nukem Forever's crude humor and dated gameplay didn't go down well with modern gamer. On the other hand, the 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Doom remake reinvigorated the franchise. The difference between the two is that the Duke Nukem remake was built on the worst qualities of the original game, while the Doom remake used the best pa𓂃rts of the original game and enhanced them. If developers are going to remake classic games, th♔e new versions need to -- at the very at least -- improve on the original and provide a fresh experience.
It seems like remakes are here to stay, and we'll like🌟ly see more and more released in the future. However, publishers need to choose wisely when deciding which games to remake. Some classics deserve to rest in peace and be remembered for what they were.