168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Overwatch 2 is right around the corner, and 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:even thoughꦡ it shouldn’t really🅷 exist, there’s an air of excitement around its launch. The first 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Overwatch completely reinvented the online shooter space when it launched in 2016, and deserves to be spoken about in the same breath as gaming’s all time greats. It was fresh, fast, and fiendishly compelliꦅng, but the very 💙fact a sequel exists highlights how much Overwatch has fallen off the pace. The latest revelation about the hero roster only underscores this further.
Overwatch led the way for the likes of Fortnite, 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Apex Legends, Paladins, Bleeding Edge, and Valorant. Even 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Destiny 2 seems to have taken as much from Overwatch as it has the original Destiny. But what those games have in common is the exact thing that stands Overwatch ꧂2 apart for the wrong reasons. Sequels to Fortnite, Apex Legends, and Valorant will never arrive - instead the games continue to evolve with constant updates, new battle passes, and frequent seasonal events pulling you back in. Even Destiny 2, though a sequel itself, is abandoning that model in order to keep building and evolving as it is.
Overwatch 2 is not entirely unique in this regard; 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Call of Duty still does yearly releases, and even the ever-popular Warzone is getting a sequel. 168澳洲幸运5开🌼奖网:S❀platoon 3 just enjoyed a stellar launch too, although not without cr🔴iticism that it too would be be🅷tter served in the modern environment as an ever-evolving service game rather than a brand new one.
Overwatch 2 is free to play, so in theory it’s not too much of an issue that it’s an entirely new game. Splatoon and Call of Duty both charge full price for their updates on what came before, and Overwatch 2 at least avoids that. But it doesn’t mitigate how dated Overwatch 2’s structure already feels, and how much that contrasts with how the initial game felt at launch. Overwatch is a hero shooter, and part ofཧ its popularity has been the affection for its heroes, not to mention how differently each of its roster plays. There are characters with pistols, shotguns, bazookas, ice blasters, revolvers, sniper rifles, mech suits, and bows and arrows, but whatever the weapon is, Blizzard seems dead set on aiming them all directly at its feet.
I know some other games do this. Valorant and League of Legends are both successful, and both require heroes (agents and champions, respectively) to be unlocked from the off. But crucially the original Overwatch did not, and that was a major part of the appeal. This unlocking system was at one time commonplace in the fighting genre, until studios realised this was no fun and served no purpose. Overwatch 2 seems to be deliberately making the game less fun in the hopes of ensnarin🍬g players to keep playing until their favourite hero is let out of jail. A more confident hand would give you the heroes from the start and trust that it’s good enough for you to stick around.
Unlocking old heroes only applies to new players, buꦯt going forward the battle pass will come into play. With that, free players will need to grind to unlock heroes, while premium players will get them automatically. It seems to go against Overwatch’s greatest strength that some players can have access to so many more heroes, and so much earlier. Of course, it might seem like Overwatch cannot win. I’ve just complained that it is opting for the sequel model, and now I’m criticising it for going down the seasonal route. Maybe that’s just it though. Maybe Overwatch cannot win. It was the perfect game at the perfect time, and it feels impossible to think it might ever recapture that magic.
Overwatch 2 will be out in the⛄ wild soon, and the internet won’t be short of opinions on it. I don’t know if it can ever be as good as the original was, but locking new playe🍸rs out of using its most popular and iconic heroes doesn’t seem like a winning strategy.