The narrative of the first 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Red Dead Redemption (RDR) rivals many a blockbuster. Rockstar's Wild West reimagined took five years of development and became one of the most expensive videogames ever made. So a Red Dead Redemption film adꦐaptation could ꦿbe a heavyweight in the film industry if it's done right. One thing every fan dreads is a lousy Hollywood concoction of their favorite game.
And they have a good reason to. 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Street Fighter, Hitman, Doom, you name it, it's a silver screen disaster. Either the directors don't have a strong understanding of the game they're adapting. Or they borrow the title and the world and disengage the film from the original. With that in mind, here are five directors who could pull RDR movie off. And five who should take a pass.
10 Sho🍰uld: Ang Lee 🎃
The Taiwanese director proved that LGBTQ hardships could be the focal point of a Western film. In the 2005 starring Heath Ledger and Jake Gyllenhaal, Lee paints a sincere picture of two closeted gay cowboys battling their inner conflicts. The personal note of the Brokeback Mountain demonstrates Lee's ability to get in the face of the char🔴acters and captꦓure the unseen turmoil.
John Marston has to juggle bounty h🔯unting and being a family man. These imp✤lacable lifestyles must leave more than literal scars on the former outlaw. And if there is a man capable of translating Marston's inner demons to screen, it's Ang Lee.
9 ও ꦡ Shouldn't: Antoine Fuqua
The Pittsburgh native has some seriously enjoyable stuff under his belt. His 2015 boxing drama and 2014 action thriller r comes to mind. Fuqua's films⛦ have powerful set-ups𒊎 and show skill in the execution of the scenes.
But, they never scratch beyond the surface and the cliché. His 2016 remake of a Western classic stays in the lines of a good old shootout. The film doesn't pretend to be anything else. And everybody enjoys a good old shootout from time to time. However, RDR deserves a bit more finesse.
8 Should: Aꦆlfonso Cuarón ♒
The meta-story of RDR talks about the Old West way of life disappearing. Pinkert꧃ons swarm towns, and what evades them gets picked out by bounty hunters. The industrial revolution arrives.✤ Railroads zigzag once virgin land, and the Wild West dies under its frets. Powers that be shift and Marston gets caught up in the middle. Cuarón's 2006 apocalyptic pilgrimage nails a tormented man estranged from the world he lives in.
Cuarón knows how to handle an intricate redemption story.ꦗ The vindication of the main protagonist Theo portrayed by Clive Owen plays a pi🍨votal role during the film. And, like Marston, Theo dies as part of his absolution.
7 Shouldn't: Zack Snyder 𒀰
The king of slow motion, Snyder, is all about the frame. His 2007 film profits from this approach and leaves viewers with a cathartic experience of pure cinematography. Yet, the prolific DC director shoots himself in the foot with this tactic in most movies after 300.
The 2015 comic book adaptation is a titular example. Snyder can't quite drag the audience into the world enough, and so the story remains flat in many instances. The reason RDR stomped pretty much all the competition out of the Western genre is the very t✤hing this director fails at. Epic camera angles and intricate slo-mo sequences can't substitute a compelling💯 narrative with excellent characters.
6 Should: Deniꦿs Villeneuve
This Canadian filmmaker has been on a roll for the last few years. With 2015 , 2016 , and 2017 in his portfolio Villeneuve knows how to🐷 milk that mise en scene. He uses the worlds sur﷽rounding his protagonists to give the stories that extra oomph effect.
Villeneuve also knows how to create the right mix between visceral action and psychological advance, as seen in Sicario. Not everyone is keen on the Tros-Riviéres born direct🌠or. But one thing is for sure; he is a top gun when it comes to immersive filmmaking.
5 🧜 Shouldn't: Robert Rodrig💖uez
ꦰNow, this man has some cult classics to his name. From 1992 to 2005 , Rodriguez knows how to pull off an entertaining budget flick. For the most part, that is. He follows every good movie with at least one flop.
It's a hit and miss at best. And even if it's a hit, not counting Sin City, Rodriguez never raises above B director status. Without a doubt, Rockstar's Western needs some crazy weird to stay true to itself. Rodriguez, however, might be just a little bit too crazy weird. So don't let the hat fool you. This Texan should steer clear of directing an RDR film.
4 🌳 Should: The Coen Brothers
Speaking of crazy weird, Ethan and Joel Coen are masters of spicing their films with the right amount of ludicrous. Their 1998 takes a complete bum 🐻of a character and makes the audience stick by him through thick and thin. More recently, in the anthology of Wild West stories , they bring the extraordinary out of the ordinary. It's played both for laughs and cries.
The Coen Brothers know how to write a tight journey. But they also know how to hide gold nuggets in it. These unnecessary yet character-giving moments also keep RDR alive years after its release.
3 ꦆ Shouldn't: Quentin Tarantino
Creative vision Tarantino has for his films, as bizarre as it can be, rarely comes down in flames. Plus, he st▨uffs his movies with the as much as possible. The 2013 Western proves he can do it well too.
It's less about whether Tarantino could pull the live-action RDR off and more about what kind of film it would be. The danger Tarantino's take on the RDR faces is the complete overhaul of the original. He is a filmmaker with a very distinct style. The world might gain another Tarantino movie, but it might not be the RDR one would recognize.
2 Should: Kathryn Bigelow ꦇ 𒉰
That Red Dead Redemption is a 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:high impact content goes without saying. High impact a🌳lso defines films of this Californian director. Bigelow's most renowned film, 2008 , earned her an Academy Award. Bu💝t, she preceded and followed it by a stream of top tier quality work.
In terms of RDR adaptation, the most standout film is her 1987 . says that she wanted to make a full-blooded western. But, there was no market for it at the time. So Bigelow went and made a Horror Western. And it still holds water after 30 years. If someone can do vampires and Western, they can also make a good RDR adaptation.
1 Shou꧙ldn't: Clint Eastwood
Eastwood made his name shooting and acting in Westerns. His expertise in the genre almost landed him as 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:the voice of John Marston. But, maybe he knows it a little too much. If star got his hands on RDR, the adaptation might face the exact oppositeꩲ issue to Tarantino.
Without a doubt, Eastwood would shoot a well made Western. Whether he would retain the weird, the funny, and the quirky that makes RDR ꦇstand out is up for debate. Rockstar's masterpiece isn't another , as good of a film the latter𝔍 is.