When deciding what brand of 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:smartphone to purchase next, it may well be worthwhile to stay away from Sony, at least for those who higher residual values. According to a new study from Compare My Mobile, a gadget recycling comparison website and a part of Decision Tech Ltd., Sony ranks worst for resale value of mobile devices, while Apple ranks best by a wide margin.
In an analysis of six brands and several models, Apple iPhones appear to best hold their residual value, depreciating only 48.25% on average over three years. Meanwhile, Sony performed the worse, with a massive depreciation averaging 76.41% over the same period, and also losing the most value the quickest, with 69% 💎of residual value dropping in only t🌳he first two months of ownership.
It should be noted however that in the end, Huawei and Google both did nearly as poorly as Sony in mainta𝓡ining smartph🌳one value over the initial two months following a purchase. Meanwhile, Apple, Oneplus, and Samsung all did much better. In each case, the models selected were compatible in terms of company flagship models, with different models performing different in terms of depreciation, with a full table of models and data available by clicking . On average, each brand depreciated as follows:
- Apple - £885 at purchase, £427 three years later, a depreciation of 48.25%
- Oneplus - £602 at purchase, £328 three years later, a depreciation of 51.51%
- Samsung - £884 at purchase, £506 three years later, a depreciation of 57.21%
- Huawei - £594 at purchase, £423 three years later, a depreciation of 71.19%
- Google - £705 at purchase, £537 three years later, a depreciation of 76.26%
- Sony - £737 at purchase, £563 three years later, a depreciation of 76.41%
The data comes from a recent study asking 2,000 adults in the UK, 73% of which swap out their smartphones every 🐻two years, and only 10% of respondents keeping their devices for longer than three years. The phones chosen were based on
T𓆉he study should prove useful for anyone considering a new device in the near future, especially as prices for new smartphones do not seem to decrease. Since so many users find themselves replacing their device after only two years, there is little reason to consider purchasing a device that will lose most of its value within only a few months of ownership.
This is espec𒅌ially true because planned obsolescence remains a constant practice when it comes to mobile devices. Technically speaking, a smartphone could work for many years after purchase with the hardware suffering no issues, but it is the software that becomes problematic over time.
This was recently brought to light once again when Samsung that its Galaxy S20 series and Z Flip, some of the most expensive phones ever released by the company, would only be receiving the 🐼standard two years of full support, followed by two years of basic security updates.
This is not out of the ordinary for smartphone manufacturers, and such behavior provides an incentive for users to upgrade more often to a newer, flashier option through the release of new software. Given that mo💦st u꧃sers trade in after only two years, it might be best to avoid those brands that depreciate so quickly, and stick to those with far better residual values.
Source: Good Brothers, PR Agency,