In 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:late April of this year, a massive dump of spoilers for NaughtyDog's 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:The Last of Us Part II appeared online. Revealing practically the entire story and even showing segments of gameplay, it was fairly substantial in what was shown off. Many began to as🐽sume this would be a d♈eath knell for the game, especially since "fans" were talking about how poorly written and executed it was.
Wouldn't you k🌊now it? That hasn't happened at all.
, pre-order numbers for the upcoming sequel are skyrocketing in Europe. While that is only one country, the over on Amazon in the US. People are hotly ant💃icipating the continuation of this story, spoilers or not. PlayStation CE🐬O Jim Ryan even said, "We hope this'll be a defining game for this generation." Why, exactly, is this happening?
This twe❀et from Twitter user Sarobi sums it up incredibly well:
There's a strange trend with modern social media discourse in where certain users lash out against things they don't like. Deeming them to be irrevocably awful, they'll go out of their way to ensure no one likes the thing they don't. The idea is that all of the negativity attached to a specific topic wiꩲll turn off any newcomers from it. Ironically (or coincidentally, depending on how you look at it), the reverse is true.
When those perceived as "nerds" or "dweebs" start screeching about how terrible something is, people who are indifferent now feel emboldened to grab it out of spite. There are a ton of psychological studies posted on the matter, but sum𒐪s it up well: "It is interesting, from a psychological point of view, to know that people do seem to enjoy inflicting harm on others, even when this incurs costs for themselves."
The harm, in this case, is simply granting monetary success to a game that a vocal minority is decreeing as "terrible." It's hardly an important matter, but it still fits into that summation. Even without caring about The Last of Us, you want to see thesꦍe naysayers explode in rage when the game does well. You spending $60 is a small pri🍸ce to pay for that.
Source: , ,