As promised, 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Wizards of the Coast has presented the latest revision of its Open Gaming License, called OGL 1.2, to the public. After 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:leaked drafts of OGL 1.1 sent the entire 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Dungeons & Dragons community 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:into a furor for charging creators a 25-percent royalty and opening the door to content theft, Wizards apo♏lo✤gized and took OGL 1.1 back to the drawing board. Days later, D&D exectuive producer Kyle Brink 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:offered another apology, but also a promise for the next iteration of OGL to be developed in collaboration with the D&D community.To that end, Wizards of the Coast has presented OGL 1.2 for public consideration. As stated on the , "There's no royalty payment, no financial reporting, no license-back, no registration, no distinction between commercial and non-commercial. Nothing will impact any content you have already published under OGL 1.0a. That will always be licensed under OGL 1.0a." This was a key concern with third-party publishers and smaller creators publishing content for D&D.Related: How Critical Role Helped♐ Me Fall Back In Love With Fanta𓆏syPlayers and creatives, however, are still concerned with some provisions in OGL 1.2. While Wizards 🐻said in its post on D&D Beyond that content published under OGL 1.0a is safe, OGL 1.2 still deauthorizes the original OGL, which some fans are calling a “.” Wizards argues that it needs to deauthorize the previous licens💖e in order to enact new protective measures that forbid hateful content, but creators say that hateful content was never a problem and that OGL 1.2 provides Wizards on what content gets published and what doesn't.

OGL 1.2 also requires users to waive their right to a class-action or jury trial in the event of a legal dispute. Players aren't likely to care, larger third-party publishers look at these c♋lauses with worry that Wizards is again seeki♕ng to grab power from creators.

People are still picking the new li🉐cense apart on on , but the overall vibe is still pretty negative. Wizards did say this would be an iterative꧋ process and this is still just a draft document, so changes are not only possible but expected. We'll see where WotC is willing to budge in the coming days.

Next: I Hope The Laꦬst Of Us' Easter Eggs Don't Become Too D🅠istracting