As the esports industry continues its rapid climb with money and influence seemingly pouring in at a geometric rate, it has shined a light on an issue of wealth inequality with regards to female competitors. In a study o🍨f the richest players and most profitable games, no women rank anywhere near the top 100 males with a stunning gap between them. Facing extreme toxicity, as well as little to no representation in some of the biggest esports titles, women are facing an 🌜uphill battle in a male-dominated environment.
that the top 100 male players have earned $192.4 million, whereas the top 100 females account for only $2.8 million, a disparity of 6,863%. Sasha “Scarlett” Hostyn serves as the only female in the ♏top 500 with total career earnings of $349,455. With regards to the women, the average earnings sit at $28,000 compared to $1.9 million for males. This comes at a time where female participation has significantly increased compared to previous years with an estimated 30% of esports audiences are female.
Though the study did not include what could be causing such a dramatic gap, various esports communities have shown hostility to women in the past and the toxicity directed towards females often go way out of bounds. We’ve seen 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Street Fighter legend Ricki Ortiz pausing her career after facing waves of vitriol for coming out as trans, 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Overwatch and other deflating moments that may give female competꦕitors pause.
The majority of female players in the top 100 stick to 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:CS:GO, but very few are active in big money titles such as 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:League of Legends, 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Call of Duty, or esports’ most profitable title 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Dota 2. Whether this has to do with the notorious toxicity these games are known for, or just a lack of interest in the player base is not clear, but Dota 2 tournaments that dole out prize money in the millions and the Call of Duty Challengers league having various priz🌱es from $25,000 to $250,000 will only increase the gap.
If female viewership and participation continue to rise as it has, then the likelihood of a female winning a major tournament or event could open the floodgates for a more integrated player-verse. At the same time, making events more inviting for womenwouldn’t be so bad as it would mean having more attention with regards to security, safety and conduct. Hopef🧜ully the next time this list is revisited, it’ll paint a picture of a wide open field of competition for men and women alike.
Source: